پژوهش در طب ورزشی و فناوری

نقش تکنولوژی اطلاعات و حمایت سازمانی ادراک شده بر عملکرد داوران جام جهانی فوتبال روسیه 2018

نویسندگان

محمدرضا منصوری 1
محمدرضا اسماعیلی 2
فریده اشرف گنجویی 2
زهرا حاجی‌انزهایی 1

1 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران مرکز

2 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی

https://doi.org/10.29252/jsmt.12.1.89
چکیده
زمینه و هدف: با توجه به تجارت گسترده­ای که در برخی از ورزش­ها وجود دارد، یک تصمیم نادرست داوری نه تنها می­تواند عواقب مالی عظیمی را برای شرکت کنندگان در رقابت داشته باشد، بلکه خود رویداد را نیز تحت تأثیر قرار می­دهد. هدف کلی پژوهش حاضر تعیین نقش تکنولوژی اطلاعات و حمایت سازمانی ادراک شده بر عملکرد داوران جام جهانی فوتبال روسیه 2018: بررسی نقش میانجی رضایت شغلی و خودسودمندی بود. روش: این پژوهش توصیفی، مدل همبستگی، مبتنی بر مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری، و نوع آن کاربردی است. جامعۀ آماری پژوهش را تمام داوران و کمک داوران حاضر در جام جهانی فوتبال روسیه 2018 تشکیل دادند که از این تعداد 111 داور بود که 35 داور وسط، 63 کمک داور و 13 کمک داور ویدئویی بودند. یافته­ها: نتایج رابطه مثبت معناداری بین تکنولوژی اطلاعات، حمایت سازمانی ادراک شده و خودسودمندی بر عملکرد داوران جام جهانی فوتبال روسیه 2018 را نشان داد. در حالی‌که رابطه معناداری بین رضایت شغلی و عملکرد داوران جام جهانی فوتبال روسیه 2018 دیده نشد. نتیجه­گیری: تکنولوژی اطلاعات به عنوان یک عامل موثر و تسهیل­ساز در تصمیم­گیری داوران می­باشد، لذا پیشنهاد می­شود زیرساخت­های تکنولوژیکی در راستای بهبود تصمیمات لحظه­ای داوران در سطحی گسترده­تر فراهم گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

تکنولوژی اطلاعات
حمایت سازمانی ادراک شده
عملکرد
داوران جام جهانی فوتبال

عنوان مقاله English

The role of information technology and perceived organizational support on the performance of the referees of the 2018 FIFA World Cup in Russia

چکیده English

Background and Aim: Given the widespread trade in some sports, a misjudging decision can not only have huge financial consequences for competitors, but also affect the event itself. The overall purpose of this study was to determine the role of information technology and perceived organizational support on the performance of the referees of the 2018 FIFA World Cup in Russia: to investigate the mediating role of job satisfaction and self-efficacy. Methods: This is a descriptive research, correlation model, based on structural equation modeling, and its type. The statistical population of the study consisted of all referees and assistant referees present at the 2018 FIFA World Cup in Russia, of which 111 referees were 35 middle referees, 63 assistant referees and 13 video assistant referees. Results: The results showed that information technology, perceived organizational support and self-interest have a significant positive effect on the performance of the referees of the 2018 FIFA World Cup in Russia. Job satisfaction does not have a significant effect on the performance of the referees of the 2018 FIFA World Cup in Russia. Conclusion: Information technology is an effective and facilitating factor in arbitrators' decisions, so it is suggested to provide technological infrastructure in order to improve the instant decisions of arbitrators on a larger scale.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Information technology
Perceived organizational support
performance
2018 FIFA World Cup referees
1. Van Quaquebeke, N., & Giessner, S.R. (2010). How embodied cognitions affect judgments: Height-related attribution bias in football foul calls. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(1), 3-22
2. Mascarenhas, D.R., Collins, D., & Mortimer, P. (2005). Elite refereeing performance: Developing a model for sport science support. The Sport Psychologist, 19(4), 364-379.
3. Samuel, R.D., Galily, Y., & Edson Filho, G.T. (2020). Implementation of the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) as a Career Change-Event: The Israeli Premier League Case Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.
4. Han, B., Chen, Q., Lago-Penas, C., Wang, C., & Liu, T. (2020). The influence of the video assistant referee on the Chinese Super League. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 15(5-6), 662-668.
5. Hamidi, M., Mohmmadkazemi, R., & Gatabi, H.S. (2013). Identifying innovation potentials in football industry: a case study on refereeing. Journal of Sport Management and Development, 2(1), 55-64. Retrieved from https://www.magiran.com/paper/1575169. (Persian)
6. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500.
7. Chang, C.-M., Liu, L.-W., Hsieh, H.-H., & Chen, K.-C. (2020). A multilevel analysis of organizational support on the relationship between person-environment fit and performance of university physical education teachers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 2041.
8. Yongxing, G., Hongfei, D., Baoguo, X., & Lei, M. (2017). Work engagement and job performance: the moderating role of perceived organizational support. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 33(3), 708-713.
9. Fristin, Y. (2019). The Importance of Work Satisfaction in Mediating The Relationship Between Superleader and Employee Performance. Journal of Public Administration Studies (JPAS), 3(2), 89-95.
10. Kose, H., Polat, A., & Turker, Y. (2017). Explaining Job Engagement & Job Satisfaction Dimensions related to Sport Facility Employees. Journal of Business and Management, 19(10), 35-40.
11. Ghanbar pour nosrati, A., Khabiri, M., poorsoltani zarandi, H., aghaii, N. (2015). The Role of Job Satisfaction in the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Turnover Intention in Experts of Sport Federations. Journal of Sport Management, 6(4), 683-696. doi: 10.22059/jsm.2015.53123. (Persian)
12. Coban, B. (2010). An evaluation of the job satisfaction levels of Turkish provincial football referees. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 38(9), 1153-1165..
13. Kim, S. (2017). Perceived organizational support as a mediator between distributive justice and sports referees’ job satisfaction and career commitment. Annals of Leisure Research, 20(2), 169-187.
14. Yorulmazlar, M. M., & Kepoğlu, A. (2017). job satisfaction levels of volleyball referees serving at turkish 1ST, 2ND and 3RD Leagues(Istanbul Sample). European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v0i0.1285.
15. Bandura, A. (1997). The anatomy of stages of change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 8-10. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.8
16. Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E., & Sullivan, P. J. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport: Human Kinetics.
17. Spencer, B. D. (2015). Self-efficacy and performance in volleyball referees. Michigan State University.
18. Karacam, A., & Adiguzel, N.S. (2019). Examining the Relationship between Referee Performance and Self-Efficacy. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 377-382.
19. Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results.
20. Farmer, S. M., & Fedor, D. B. (1999). Volunteer Participation and Withdrawal. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9(4), 349-368. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.9402.
21. Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L., Guillén, F., & Dithurbide, L. (2012). Development of, and Initial Validity Evidence for, the Referee Self-Efficacy Scale: A Multistudy Report. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(6), 737-765. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.6.737.
22. Pan, X. (2020). Technology Acceptance, Technological Self-Efficacy, and Attitude Toward Technology-Based Self-Directed Learning: Learning Motivation as a Mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294