پژوهش در طب ورزشی و فناوری

تدوین شاخص‌های ارزیابی وضعیت‌بدنی پویا در دختران جوان دارای کایفوز طبیعی و کایفوز افزایش‌یافته

نویسندگان

فاطمه امیری زاده
رضا رجبی
محمد کریمی زاده اردکانی

دانشکده تربیت بدنی دانشگاه تهران

https://doi.org/10.29252/jsmt.12.1.97
چکیده
هدف تحقیق حاضر تدوین شاخص‌های ارزیابی وضعیت‌بدنی پویا دختران جوان دارای کایفوز طبیعی وافزایش‌یافته بود. تحقیق حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و روش گردآوری داده‌ها نوع پژوهش‌های نیمه تجربی بود. (جامعه آماری دختران 18 تا 24 سال استان خوزستان تشکیل دادند که به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس200نفرانتخاب و براساس نرم زاویه کایفوز با خط‌کش منعطف به دو گروه با کایفوز توراسیک طبیعی(100 نفر)و غیرطبیعی(100 نفر)تقسیم شدند). برای ارزیابی وضعیت‌بدنی پویا از آزمون‌های صاف‌کردن ستون فقرات، موقعیت نسبت به دیوار، دسترسی به جلو، چرخش خلفی لگن، آویزان‌کردن سر، دامنه حرکتی شانه، دامنه حرکتی شانه چرخش داخلی و چرخش خارجی استفاده شد. برای مقایسه میانگین گروه‎ها با توجه به نرمال نبودن توزیع داده‌ها از آزمون یومن‌ویتنی استفاده شد. محاسبات آماری بوسیله نرم افزار آماری SPSS21 انجام شد. سطح معنی‌داری در تمامی آزمون‌های آماری برابر 05/0 در نظر گرفته شد. نتایج نشان داد بین نمرات جزئی و کلی آزمون ارزیابی وضعیت‌بدنی پویا هر دو گروه تفاوت معناداری وجود داشت و گروه کایفوز طبیعی نسبت به گروه کایفوز افزایش‌یافته وضعیت‌بدنی پویا بهتری داشتند. بنابراین آزمون‌های ارزیابی وضعیت‌بدنی پویا ابزار مناسبی جهت ارزیابی و شناسایی محدودیت‌ها و اختلالات حرکتی افراد مبتلا به ناهنجاری کایفوز افزایش‌یافته به شمار می‌روند.


کلیدواژه‌ها

وضعیت‌بدنی پویا
کایفوز
کایفوز افزایش‌یافته

عنوان مقاله English

Establishment of dynamic postural assessment indicators in young girls with and without hyper-kyphosis

چکیده English

Hyper-kyphosis anomalies are common disorders of spine. The aim of this study was to Establishment of dynamic postural assessment indicators in young girls with and without hyper-kyphosis.

In the study, 200 girls were selected according to the angle of kyphosis they were divided into two groups comprising of with and without Hyper-kyphosis. Evaluate dynamic posture, the tests back flattening, wall angle position, bilateral forward reach, pelvic tail tuck, head hanging forward, shoulder mobility, shoulder range in internal rotation and external rotation were used. The results showed a significant difference between the partial and general scores of the dynamic body condition assessment test for girls, with and without Hyper-kyphosis. The normal kyphosis group had better dynamic posture than the Hyper-kyphosis group. Dynamic body posture assessment tests can be considered good tool to assess and identify the limitations and movement disorders of people with Hyper-kyphosis.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Dynamic posture
Kyphosis
Hyper-kyphosis
1. Vaughn DW, Brown EW. The influence of an in-home based therapeutic exercise program on thoracic kyphosis angles. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2007;20(4):155-65.
2. Katzman WB, Wanek L, Shepherd JA, Sellmeyer DE. Age-related hyperkyphosis: its causes, consequences, and management. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2010;40(6):352-60.
3. Bansal S, Katzman WB, Giangregorio LM. Exercise for improving age-related hyperkyphotic posture: a systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2014;95(1):129-40.
4. Cunha-Henriques S, Costa-Paiva L, Pinto-Neto AM, Fonsechi-Carvesan G, Nanni L, Morais SS. Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and musculoskeletal status: a comparative cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research. 2011;3(4):168.
5. Nishiwaki Y, Kikuchi Y, Araya K, Okamoto M, Miyaguchi S, Yoshioka N, et al. Association of thoracic kyphosis with subjective poor health, functional activity and blood pressure in the community-dwelling elderly. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine. 2007;12(6):246-50.
6. Azadinia F, Kamyab M, Behtash H, Maroufi N, Larijani B. The effects of two spinal orthoses on balance in elderly people with thoracic kyphosis. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2013;37(5):404-10.
7. Clark M, Lucett S. NASM essentials of corrective exercise training: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
8. Palmieri RM, Ingersoll CD, Cordova ML, Kinzey SJ, Stone MB, Krause BA. The effect of a simulated knee joint effusion on postural control in healthy subjects. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2003;84(7):1076-9.
9. Demircan E, Kulic D, Oetomo D, Hayashibe M. Human movement understanding. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine. 2015;22(3):22-4.
10. Johansson H, Sjölander P, Sojka P. A sensory role for the cruciate ligaments. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1991(268):161-78.
11. Riemann BL, Caggiano NA, Lephart SM. Examination of a clinical method of assessing postural control during a functional performance task. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 1999;8(3):171-83.
12. Ribeiro RP, Marchetti BV, Oliveira EBd, Candotti CT. Kyphosis index obtained in X-ray and with flexicurve assessment in children and young people. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil. 2017;17(1):79-87.
13. Rajabi, R; Latifi, S (2010). Soft curvature of the dorsal spine (kyphosis) and lumbar (lordosis) of Iranian men and women. Research in Sports Science. 7, 13-30. (Persian).
14. Comerford M, Mottram S. Kinetic control-e-book: The management of uncontrolled movement: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.
15. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 1. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy: NAJSPT. 2006;1(2):62-72.
16. Liebenson C. Functional training handbook: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
17. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 1. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2014;9(3).
18. Page P, Frank CC, Lardner R. Assessment and treatment of muscle imbalance: the Janda approach: Human kinetics Champaign, IL; 2010.
19. Farokhmanesh K, Ghasemi MS, Saeedi H, Roudbari M, Emadifar R. Effect of foot hyperpronation on spine alignment, in standing position. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation. 2012;6(2):65-70.
20. GHaem H, Borhani haghighi A, Zeghami B, Dehghan A. Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Parkinson Disease Quality of Life (PDQL) Questionnaire. Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. 2010;16(1):49-57.
21. Sinaki M, Itoi E, Rogers JW, Bergstralh EJ, Wahner HW. Correlation of back extensor strength with thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis in estrogen-deficient WOMEN1. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 1996;75(5):370-4.
22. Yoo W-g, Yi C-h, Cho S-h, Jeon H-s, Cynn H-s, Choi H-s. Effects of the height of ball-backrest on head and shoulder posture and trunk muscle activity in VDT workers. Industrial Health. 2008;46(3):289-97.
23. Lee HM. Rehabilitation of the proximal crossed syndrome in an elderly blind patient: a case report. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2000;44(4):223.
24. Ben Kibler W. The role of the scapula in athletic shoulder function. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1998;26(2):325-37.
25. Sahrmann S, Azevedo DC, Van Dillen L. Diagnosis and treatment of movement system impairment syndromes. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2017;21(6):391-9.
26. Lewis JS, Green A, Wright C. Subacromial impingement syndrome: the role of posture and muscle imbalance. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2005;14(4):385-92.
27. Feldenkrais M. Body and mature behavior: a study of anxiety, sex, gravitation, and learning: North Atlantic Books; 2005.
28. Park J-Y, Lhee S-H, Oh J-H, Kim H-K. Scapular dyskinesis. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2009;12(2):271-7.
29. Khakhali-Zavieh M, Parnian-Pour M, Karimi H, Mobini B, Kazem-Nezhad A. The validity and reliability of measurement of thoracic kyphosis using flexible ruler in postural hyper kyphotic patients. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2003;4(3):18-23.
30. Imagama S, Hasegawa Y, Wakao N, Hirano K, Muramoto A, Ishiguro N. Impact of spinal alignment and back muscle strength on shoulder range of motion in middle-aged and elderly people in a prospective cohort study. European Spine Journal. 2014;23(7):1414-9.
31. Peterson-Kendall F, Kendall-McCreary E, Geise-Provance P, McIntyre-Rodgers M, Romani W. Muscles testing and function with posture and pain. US: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ltd. 2005:49-118.
32. Odom CJ, Taylor AB, Hurd CE, Denegar CR. Measurement of scapular asymmetry and assessment of shoulder dysfunction using the lateral scapular slide test: a reliability and validity study. Physical Therapy. 2001;81(2):799-809.
33. Farokhmanesh, K., Ghasemi, MS., Saeedi, H., Roudbari, M., Emadifar, R (2012). Effect of foot hyperpronation on spine alignment, in standing position. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 6 (2), 65-70. (Persian).
34. Ghaem H, Zeghami B, Dehghan A. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Parkinson disease quality of life (PDQL) questionnaire. Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. 2010;16(1):49-57.
35. Quek J, Pua Y-H, Clark RA, Bryant AL. Effects of thoracic kyphosis and forward head posture on cervical range of motion in older adults. Manual Therapy. 2013;18(1):65-71.