Relationship between Functional Movement Screen Score with Motor Proficiency and Physical Activity Levels in Elementary School Children

Authors

1 Kharazmi University

2 Ferdowsi university of Mashhad

Abstract
Introduction and aim: Physical activity and especially the motor proficiency of children have been studied from different aspects. The purpose of the present study was to determine the correlation among Functional Movement Screening scores with motor proficiency and physical activity levels of children aged 10 to 13 (Mean=11.72, SD=0.932) in Tehran province. Methods: In this descriptive study of correlation, all the children of primary schools in Tehran province were considered as the study population, from which 94 girls were selected by cluster random method. Their motor proficiency, physical activity levels, and functional movement were evaluated with Bruininks Oseretsky test-Short Form (BOT-2), International Physical Activity Questionnaire- Short Form (IPAQ-SF), and Functional Movement Screening test (FMS) respectively. Findings: The results of the Pearson correlation coefficient test showed that there is a significant relationship between the scores of the children's functional movement screening test and their BOT-2 total score (P=0.000), but the correlation between the total score of the functional movement screening test and the total score of the physical activity levels was not significant (P=0.267). Conclusion: In general, due to the existence of a significant relationship between functional movement and motor proficiency, the next step is to use early interventions and study their effect on improving children's performance and motor proficiency.

Keywords


1. King G, Law M, King S, Rosenbaum P, Kertoy MK, Young NL. A conceptual model of the factors affecting the recreation and leisure participation of children with disabilities. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics. 2003;23(1):63-90.
2. Timmons BW, LeBlanc AG, Carson V, Gorber SC, Dillman C, Janssen I, et al. Systematic review of physical activity and health in the early years (aged 0–4 years). Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 2012;23(4):773–92.
3. Timmons BW, Naylor P-J, Pfeiffer KA. Physical activity for preschool children — how much and how? Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 2007;32: S122–S34.
4. Livonen KS, Sääkslahti A, Mehtälä A, J Villberg J, Tammelin T, Kulmala J, et al. Relationship between fundamental motor skills and physical activity in 4-year-old preschool children. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2013;117(2):627-46.
5. Adamo K, Wilson S, Harvey A, Grattan K, Naylor P, Temple V, et al. Does Intervening in Childcare Settings Impact Fundamental Movement Skill Development? Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2016;48(5):926-32.
6. Harvey WJ, Mcgill U. Fundamental movement skills and associated physical activity experiences of children with ADHD. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2007;68(3):927-32.
7. Shannon T, Nora F, Angela M. CO-OP Intervention for Young Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health. 2007;27(4):124-30.
8. Khan NA, Hillman CH. The relation of childhood physical activity and aerobic fitness to brain function and cognition: a review. Pediatric Exercise Science. 2014;26(2):138–46.
9. Harter S. The determinants and mediational role of global self-worth in children. In N Eisenberg (Ed), Contemporary topics in developmental psychology New York: Wiley. 1987:219-42.
10. Gallahue D, Ozmon J, Goodway J. Understanding motor development: infants, children, adolescents and adults. ed n, editor: Pennsylvania (NY): McGraw Hill Publisher.; 2012.
11. Kalaja S, Jaakkola T, Liukkonen J, Watt A. Fundamental movement skills and motivational factors influencing engagement in physical activity. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2010;111(1):15-128.
12. Cairney J, Hay J, Faught B, Mandigo J, Flouris A. Developmental coordination disorder, self-efficiency toward physical activity and play: does gender matter? Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 2005;22(1):67-83.
13. Ridgers ND, Stratton G, Fairclough SJ. Physical Activity Levels of Children during School Playtime. Sports medicine. 2006;36(4):359-71
14. Frost DM, Beach TA, Callaghan JP, McGill SM. Using the Functional Movement Screen™ to evaluate the effectiveness of training. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2012;26(6):1620-30.
15. Hardy L, King L, Farrell L, Macniven R, Howlett S. Fundamental movement skills among Australian preschool children. Journal of science and medicine in sport. 2010 Sep 1;13(5):503-8.
16. Vernetta-Santana M, Orbe-Moreno MD, Peláez-Barrios EM, López-Bedoya J. Movement quality evaluation through the functional movement screen in 12-and 13-year-old secondary-school adolescents. 2019.
17. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function–Part 2. North American journal of sports physical therapy: NAJSPT. 2006 Aug;1(3):132-9.
18. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function–part 1. North American journal of sports physical therapy: NAJSPT. 2006 May;1(2):62-72.
19. Mills JD, Taunton JE, Mills WA. The effect of a 10-week training regimen on lumbo-pelvic stability and athletic performance in female athletes: a randomized-controlled trial. Physical Therapy in sport. 2005 May 1;6(2):60-6.
20. Cook G. Weak links: screening an athlete’s movement patterns for weak links can boost your rehab and training effects. Train Cond. 2002;12: 29–37.
21. Narducci E, Waltz A, Gorski K, Leppla L, Donaldson M. The clinical utility of functional performance tests within one-year post-acl reconstruction: a systematic review. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2011 Dec;6(4):333-42.
22. Hulteen RM, Morgan PJ, Barnett LM, Stodden DF, Lubans DR. Development of foundational movement skills: A conceptual model for physical activity across the lifespan. Sports medicine. 2018;48(7):1533-40.
23. Lloyd RS, Oliver JL, Radnor JM, Rhodes BC, Faigenbaum AD, Myer GD. Relationships between functional movement screen scores, maturation and physical performance in young soccer players. Journal of sports sciences. 2015 Jan 2;33(1):11-9.
24. Kiesel K, Plisky P, Butler R. Functional movement test scores improve following a standardized off‐season intervention program in professional football players. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2011 Apr;21(2):287-92.
25. Abraham A, Sannasi R, Nair R. Normative values for the functional movement screentm in adolescent school aged children. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2015 Feb;10(1):29-36.
26. O’Brien W, Khodaverdi Z, Bolger L, Tarantino G, Philpott C, Neville RD. The assessment of functional movement in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports medicine. 2021 Sep 15:1-7.
27. Zameni L, Yeilaghi Ashrafi M.R, Khalaji H. Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C). Sport Physiology. Winter 2020; 11(44): 123-42.
28. Brown P. Movement: Functional movement systems–screening, assessing, corrective strategies on target publications. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2012 Dec;56(4):316.
29. Khezri D, Babaei L. The method of functional movement screening tests. Sport Sciences Research Institute of Iran. 2020.
30. Wright MD, Chesterton P. Functional Movement ScreenTM total score does not present a gestalt measure of movement quality in youth athletes. Journal of sports sciences. 2019;18;37(12):1393-402.
31. Lockie RG, Schultz AB, Jordan CA, Callaghan SJ, Jeffriess MD. Can selected functional movement screen assessments be used to identify movement deficiencies that could affect multidirectional speed and jump performance? The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2015;29(1):195-205.
32. Bodden JG, Needham RA, Chockalingam N. The effect of an intervention program on functional movement screen test scores in mixed martial arts athletes. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2015;29(1):219-5.
33. Loudon JK, Parkerson-Mitchell AJ, Hildebrand LD, Teague C. Functional movement screen scores in a group of running athletes. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2014;28(4): 909-13.
34. Agresta C, Slobodinsky M, Tucker C. Functional movement screen TM–normative values in healthy distance runners. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014;35(14):1203-7.
35. Perry FT, Koehle MS. Normative data for the functional movement screen in middle-aged adults. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2013;27 (2):458-62.
36. Sohrabi S, minonezhad H, seyedi F, ghaderpanah S. The relationship between functional movement screen and static and dynamic balance in athlete girl students. The 1th national conference of new achievement on physical education and sport International university of chabahar. 2015.
37. Coker CA. Improving functional movement proficiency in middle school physical education. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2018;89(3):367-72.
38. Sohrabi S, minonezhad H. The Relationship between Functional Movement Screening (FMS) and upper limb function in female athlete students. The first national conference on sport science developments in the field of health, prevention and championship. 2016.
39. Okada T, Huxel KC, Nesser TW. Relationship between core stability, functional movement, and performance. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2011 Jan 1;25(1):252-61.
40. Kambas A, Avloniti A, Christoforidis C, Giannakidou D, Venetsanou F, Fatouros I. Motor proficiency and accident proneness of preschool children. European Psychomotricity Journal. 2011;4(1):51-4.
41. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 2. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2014;9(4):549-63.
42. Parchmann CJ, McBride JM. Relationship between functional movement screen and athletic performance. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2011 Dec 1;25(12):3378-84.
43. Newton F, McCall A, Ryan D, Blackburne C, aus der Fünten K, Meyer T, Lewin C, McCunn R. Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) score does not predict injury in English Premier League youth academy football players. Science and Medicine in Football. 2017 May 4;1(2):102-6.
44. Liye Z. Relationship between Functional Movement Screening and Skill-Related Fitness in College Students. International Journal of Sports Science. 2016;6(1):11-8.
45. Okely AD, Booth ML, Patterson JW. Relationship of physical activity to fundamental movement skills among adolescents. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2001;33(11):1899-904.